Comments for IZONews

Comment on Why, 2 hours after announcement the Drudge Report still fails to MENTION the Alaskan report on Sarah Palin? by GraphicsGnome

GraphicsGnome — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:45:10 +0000

“she was surrounded by her right to dismiss her public safety commissioner”

Her husband, Todd, to use state resources as part of the effort to have Trooper Wooten dismissed. Todd says he did this with out his wife’s approval and knowledge.

Trooper Wooten is still a trooper…

What kind of trooper is Mike Wooten?

Union leaders defend him as a dedicated trooper who was already punished for his mistakes. Wooten’s confirmation clearly indicates a serious and concentrated sample of unacceptable and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct really at odds with the ethics of our profession,”

• Wooten used a Taser on his stepson.
• He illegally shot a moose.
• He drank and gaggle in his patrol car.
• He told others his member of the clergy-in-law would “eat a f’ing lead bullet” if he helped his daughter get an attorney for the divorce.
• He has been married and divorced four times.

What she did is not against the law. Todd did what he thought was right. He thought Wooten was a terrible person that should not be a cop. Do you blame him? Wooten got off for DWI, Child Abuse, Assault, DV and poaching because of the excellent o’l boy trooper buddies! YOUR RIGHT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. Union leaders say he was already punished for his mistakes! WTF is that? Any other person would have been thrown in jail!

Comment on Why, 2 hours after announcement the Drudge Report still fails to MENTION the Alaskan report on Sarah Palin? by Marvin the Martian

Marvin the Martian — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:44:04 +0000

That’s a excellent point.

I did find this eye-popping small tale
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aP5mpMUORBWM

Anyone with half a brain will find this far more appealing than anything to do with Sarah Palin.

Comment on Why, 2 hours after announcement the Drudge Report still fails to MENTION the Alaskan report on Sarah Palin? by sissy

sissy — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:26:32 +0000

And MSNBC is covering Obamas connection to ACORN and Tony Rezko and Louis Farakahns sermon . Dude you are sooooo not going to win when the journalists in this country are so far to the left that they can sip the Pacific.

Comment on Why, 2 hours after announcement the Drudge Report still fails to MENTION the Alaskan report on Sarah Palin? by gitrdoneobama

gitrdoneobama — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:18:24 +0000

Because Drudge Crash is a conservative website.

Comment on Why, 2 hours after announcement the Drudge Report still fails to MENTION the Alaskan report on Sarah Palin? by Louis666KWu

Louis666KWu — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:43:09 +0000

Because Drudge isn’t a news site. Drudge is at best, an opinion site.

Comment on WTC 7 Foreknowledge by PoetryHound

PoetryHound — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:26:21 +0000

@noozilander LOL! You don’t even recognize when you’ve been flattened. You claimed the BBC by no means retracted their tale and I showed you the retraction, dumbshit. And they again published the photo of the living guy they had formerly thought was the hijacker.

“There is no doubt he was the same guy named and pictured by the FBI”

Of course there’s doubt. He’s a different guy, asshole. The fact that you keep jumping insisting on this when you’ve been proven incorrect proves you’re a clown.

Comment on WTC 7 Foreknowledge by noozilander

noozilander — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:50:28 +0000

@PoetryHound No, cocksucker, he is the same guy. The photo is what caught his eye back in 2001. He recognised his own photo that had been released by the FBI. The tale has NEVER been retracted and the FBI has NEVER provided a apposite explanation as to why he is still on the wanted list.

You can weep all you want, but it’s fact and no amount of, “Duuuuhhhhh…, ummm…, the terrorists stole the passports of pilots with the same names” shit can cover this time, you gutless small faggot! LMAO!

Comment on WTC 7 Foreknowledge by PoetryHound

PoetryHound — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:31:14 +0000

@noozilander So first you claim the BBC by no means retracted their tale and I schooled you by showing you their retraction, and now you’re still claiming the living guy with a different face and name spelling is the same as the dead hijacker. They have different photos and names. And you still stupidly claim the FBI would knowingly announce that a living guy was a hijacker. You’re unbelievably obtuse, you silly small clown. LMAO!

Comment on WTC 7 Foreknowledge by noozilander

noozilander — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:30:41 +0000

@PoetryHound The BBC didn’t retract the tale, they simply changed some of the diction!
If you reckon that means a ‘retraction’, then you are even dumber than I’d thought possible for a human being!

You’re not one of those trained monkeys with a computer are ya?
LMFAO!

Comment on WTC 7 Foreknowledge by PoetryHound

PoetryHound — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:05:44 +0000

@noozilander You idiot, it was a retraction pure and simple. You can’t even admit it when it’s staring at you in the face. The BBC very clearly said it was a case of mistaken self. The guy who is alive had a similar name to one of the hijackers.

Two different photos. Two different name spellings. Two different public.

Meanwhile, you’re obtuse enough to judge the FBI would intentionally name a living person as one of the hijackers. That makes you a right conspiracy clown. LOL!